Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 WASH2D 575 - Abad v. Cozza

Abad v. Cozza’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2013

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · 99 Wash. 2d 373 - Diamond v. Cross · 109 Wash. 2d 484 - State v. Pelkey · 103 Wash. 2d 203 - City of Bellevue v. Acrey · 123 Wash. 2d 391 - Caritas Services, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A deferred prosecution is not tantamount to a guilty plea.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “7. [Petitioner] [f]urther agrees that if the Court revokes the order granting this Deferred Prosecution, I hereby stipulate and agree to the admissibility of the facts contained in the written police report, alcohol influence report forms, and any attachment thereto, and their admissibility in evidence to be used to support a finding of guilty. I understand that by this process, I am giving up the Constitutional right to a jury trial, the right to hear and question witnesses, the right to call witnesses, the right to call witnesses in my own behalf, and the right to testify or not to testify. 8. I understand that under the Constitution of the State of Washington, I am entitled to a trial by jury of my peers who would determine my guilt or innocence. I understand before signing this Acceptance of Deferred Prosecution and Stipulation of Facts and waiver that I have the right to be represented by an attorney, and that if I cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for me without cost or expense. I do hereby voluntarily and with knowledge of the above rights waive my right to a jury trial and consent to the trial of this case by the Court pursuant to paragraph seven (7) above.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “execute, as a condition of receiving [alcohol or drug abuse] treatment, a statement that contains: (a) An acknowledgment of his rights; (b) a stipulation to the admissibility of the facts contained in the written police report; and (c) an acknowledgment that the statement will be entered and used to support a finding of guilty if the court finds cause to revoke the order granting deferred prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.