Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 A.2d 401 - Geier v. Laughlin

Geier v. Laughlin’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1985

3 state decisions

101957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bogorad v. Schwarz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * We cannot weigh the evidence. Our review of the evidence is limited to determining whether it furnished substantial support for the trial court’s finding. Here the parties squarely differed as to the terms of their agreement and as to many things that occurred thereafter. The issue was strictly factual. * * *” 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.