¶1We think this order should be modified by restricting the examination to the authority given by the defendant to Manning who, the plain*899tiff claims, was the defendant’s agent. As so modified the order should he affirmed, without costs. Present — Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
129 A.D. 898
Clark v. Chanler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1908
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1908-12-15
<p>Appeal from an order entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 34th day of Hovember, 1908, denying a motion to vacate an order for the defendant’s examination before trial.</p>
Decided 1908-12-15