In Re Holub’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman) (2003), In Re Allied Computer Repair, Inc. (1996)
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 330
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Grant v. George Schumann Tire & Battery Co. · In Re Cuisine Magazine, Inc. · In Re Braniff, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In general, professional time is limited to those tasks performed while representing the trustee in the prosecution of contested matters and adversary proceedings, attendance at court hearings in the capacity of attorney or other professional when the trustee has an interest, the preparation of professional related applications, and the performance of other specialized services that cannot be performed practically or lawfully by the trustee without engaging the services of a professional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Butterbaugh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.