¶1Appeal from a judgment for intervenor in a suit for the recovery of personal property levied upon hy defendant, as sheriff, under attachment in favor of plaintiff against third party.
¶2The findings are unusually full and explicit, hut in "the conclusions of law the word “plaintiff” is inadvertently used for “intervenor,” which is the ground urged for reversal. (Dougherty v. Ward, 89 Cal. 81.)
¶3We recommend that the judgment he affirmed.
¶4Gray, C., and Haynes, C., concurred.
¶5For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed. McFarland, J., Temple, J., Henshaw, J.