Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 Cal. App. 518 - Swing v. Lingo

129 Cal. App. 518 - Swing v. Lingo’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
December 1971
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 1971

23 state decisions

8019331940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Callet v. Alioto · Breeze v. Brooks · 39 Cal. App. 738 - Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co. · Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co. · 127 Cal. App. 202 - Sly v. American Indemnity Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whenever the owner of a motor vehicle registered under this act shall sell or transfer his interest in and the possession of said motor vehicle to another, said owner shall immediately notify the Division of Motor Vehicles of such sale or transfer, giving the date of same, the names and addresses of such owner and of the transferee, and such description of the vehicle as may be called for in any official form provided for such purpose by the division; provided however, that in the event said notice be given, or in the event of failure to give said notice, an owner who has made a bona fide sale or transfer of such motor vehicle and delivered possession thereof to a purchaser and who has made proper endorsement and delivery of the certificate of ownership as provided in this act, shall not by reason of any of the provisions of this act be deemed the owner of such motor vehicle so as to be subject to liability under the provisions of section 1714% of the Civil Code of this State. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ . . . Since the statute imposes a new and unusual liability which partakes of the nature of a penalty, it should not, at least, receive a construction favoring the imposition of such liability.” (Citing authorities.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.