129 Cal. App. 2d 23 - Rupp v. Rupp’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2002
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wilder v. Wilder · Wolfe v. Wolfe · 109 Cal. App. 2d 155 - Levene v. Levene · James v. James
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Did the record show that the trial court’s ruling was correct because plaintiff had failed to use the due diligence which would entitle her to an execution for the full amount of defendant’s delinquency to the date of plaintiff’s motionl””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Simonet v. Simonet
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.