Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 CALAPP2D 565 - People v. Salinas

People v. Salinas’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 1961
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 30 Cal. App. 2d 185 - People v. King · People v. Bigelow · 41 Cal. App. 2d 586 - People v. Chan Chaun · People v. Burton · People v. Cuellar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant next contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a separate trial. A defendant, jointly charged with another ‘ “is not entitled to a separate trial as a matter of right, and the question of severance rests entirely in the discretion of the trial court. People v. Burton, 91 Cal.App. 2d 695, 715 , 205 P.2d 1065, 1077 ; People v. King, 30 Cal.App.2d 185 , 85 P.2d 928 . In the absence of any showing that the trial court abused its discretion in this regard, its ruling will not be disturbed on appeal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.