Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 CALAPP2D 803 - Griffith v. Griffith

Griffith v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 1969
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barham v. Barham · 18 Cal. 2d 445 - Keener v. Keener · Cardinale v. Cardinale · 17 Cal. 2d 736 - Comfort v. Comfort · 63 Cal. App. 2d 747 - Crouch v. Crouch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The sufficiency of the corroborative testimony, as in the present ease, lies in the sound discretion of the trial court. [Citation.] It is likewise settled that it is unnecessary that all of plaintiff’s testimony be corroborated. [Citation.] It is sufficient if the corroborative evidence strengthens and confirms the testimony of the party seeking a dissolution of the marriage. [Citation.] ” (P. 809.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.