State v. Chicorelli’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1999
3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on William v. Beck · State v. Zimnaruk · State v. Lalouche · Commonwealth v. Collberg · People v. . Gibson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“this statute was evidently not drawn with a high regard for legal technicality in the expressions used. The word, `assault,' for example, was obviously not intended to be given its technical meaning, of an offer or threat of violence to the person of another, as distinguished from the actual application of that violence * * * for it was clearly the intention to include the indecent touching of the body of another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marinelli v. Ryan“it shall be no defense * * * under this section that the person assaulted consents to the act of violence or to the act of indecency,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marinelli v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.