Tileston v. Ullman’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
1 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2016
1 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1305 (Tariff Act of 1930)
Relies on Henning Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · State v. Nelson · New Haven Savings Bank v. Warner · Kelley v. Killourey · Dorman v. Carlson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any article whatever for the prevention of conception,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.