Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 F.1d 502 - In re Adler

In re Adler’s Empirical Analysis

129 F. 502 · 1904

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
July 1940
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1940

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2019041910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The creditors and their trustee in bankruptcy, by the ordinary, process of' the examination of the bankrupt, and the power to compel all witnesses who have any knowledge of Ms affairs to come before the referee and be examined in relation thereto, have ample procedure for disclosing all the facts in relation to the bankrupt’s affairs which would furMsh a foundation for the order on him to pay money into court or to surrender property in Ms possession to- the trustee. He is in a certain sense ever present in court to answer such demands, and all that is necessary is a simple motion for a rule on him to show cause against the order that is required, and petitions for that purpose are wholly unnecessary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““To invoke that power requires something like incontestible proof as against the bankrupt's denial that he has the money. * * * That remedy applies only to a fund which can be designated and traced into his possession, so that it is. in a legal sense, a tangible fund, on which the court can lay its hands, and it cannot he made to apply to some intangible money supposed to be kept in ins possession, which lie can be forced to pay by raising or procuring the money to meet the orders of the court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.