Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 F.1d 708 - United States v. McCabe

United States v. McCabe’s Empirical Analysis

129 F. 708 · 1904

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1945
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Finnell · Moelle v. Sherwood · United States v. Nix · United States v. Pitman · United States v. Gee Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““See. 715. The Circuit and District Courts may appoint criers for their courts, to be allowed the sum of two dollars per day; and the marshals may appoint such a number of persons, not exceeding five, as the judges of their respective courts may determine, to attend upon the grand and other juries, and for other necessary purposes, who shall be allowed for their services the sum of two dollars per day, to be paid by and included in the accounts of the marshal, out of any money of the United States in his hands. Such compensation shall be paid only for actual attendance, and, when both courts are in session at the same time, only for attendance on one court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.