Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

129 F.2d 1022

Docket No. 2579.

Ott v. Ned

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1942.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1942-07-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1986

2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1942-07-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Hill & Hill, of McAlester, Okl., for appellants.

¶2Charles N. Champion, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Muskogee, Okl., and Cornelius Hardy, of Tishomingo, Old., for appellees.

¶3Before PHILLIPS, BRATTON, and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appeal dismissed on motions of appellees, at the costs of appellants, for the reason that the appeal was taken from the order of the trial court overruling a motion for a new trial.

/129/f2d/1022 · .json · Public domain