Tinkoff v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
129 F.2d 21 · 1942
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1978
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hysler v. State of Florida · Tinkoff v. United States · Hysler v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As already stated, no supporting affidavits are presented and there is no disclosure as to how or by whom he could hope to prove the essential allegations of his petition.” (Page 23.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““We are charged with the responsibility of determining whether he has made a showing which would justify its allowance.” (Page 23.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““ * * * upon perjured testimony given as a result of connivance with the prosecuting officials.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.