Raymond v. Wickersham’s Empirical Analysis
129 F.2d 522 · 1942
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Throckmorton · Marshall v. Holmes · Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co. · Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. · Publicker v. Shallcross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think these decisions establish the doctrine on which we decide the present case; namely, that the acts for which a court of equity will on account of fraud set aside or annul a judgment or decree, between the same parties, rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, have relation to frauds, extrinsic or collateral, to the matter tried py the first court, and not to a frcmd in the matter on which the decree was rendered. (Italics not quoted) “That the -mischief of retrying every case in which the judgment or decree rendered on false testimony, given by perjured witnesses, or on contracts or documents whose genuineness or validity was in issue, and which are afterwards ascertained to be forged or fraudulent, would be greater, by reason of the endless nature of the strife, than any compensation arising from doing justice in individual cases.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Josserand v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.