Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 F.2d 522 - Raymond v. Wickersham

Raymond v. Wickersham’s Empirical Analysis

129 F.2d 522 · 1942

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
December 1951
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Throckmorton · Marshall v. Holmes · Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co. · Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. · Publicker v. Shallcross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think these decisions establish the doctrine on which we decide the present case; namely, that the acts for which a court of equity will on account of fraud set aside or annul a judgment or decree, between the same parties, rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, have relation to frauds, extrinsic or collateral, to the matter tried py the first court, and not to a frcmd in the matter on which the decree was rendered. (Italics not quoted) “That the -mischief of retrying every case in which the judgment or decree rendered on false testimony, given by perjured witnesses, or on contracts or documents whose genuineness or validity was in issue, and which are afterwards ascertained to be forged or fraudulent, would be greater, by reason of the endless nature of the strife, than any compensation arising from doing justice in individual cases.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.