Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 F.2d 737 - United States v. MacAlpine

United States v. MacAlpine’s Empirical Analysis

129 F.2d 737 · 1942

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
May 1983
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 1983

18 federal appellate · 1 district ·

5019421950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weiss v. United States · Worthington v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A single scheme to defraud may involve a multiplicity of ways and means of action and procedure. It may be such that the complete execution of it would involve the commission of more than one criminal offense. Mere. details may be changed and the scheme remain the same. As the execution of the scheme (or the intention to devise the scheme) proceeds, new ways may be adopted or invented to effectuate ■the original design. The important thing is that the. scheme, or the intention to devise it, shall remain the same.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.