Gerlaugh v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
129 F.3d 1027 · 1997
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Williams v. Woodford (2002), Moore v. Reynolds (1998)
42 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Teague v. Lane · Arizona v. Fulminante
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t has long been regarded as normal and proper for a judge to sit in the same case upon its remand, and to sit in successive trials involving the same defendant. ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is the totality of [defense counsel's] efforts we must examine, not just part of them in isolation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pizzuto v. Arave · Pizzuto v. Arave“propriety and legality of the death penalty”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Comer v. Schriro · Comer v. Schriro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.