Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 F.3d 1069 - United States v. Hockings

United States v. Hockings’s Empirical Analysis

129 F.3d 1069 · 1997

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
2
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Anant Ram v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2001), United States v. Daas (1999)

37 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

3001997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 2256

Relies on United States v. Lanier · Northwest Forest Resource Council v. Glickman · United States v. Woodley · United States v. Smith · Hawkins v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “look first to the plain language of the statute, construing the provisions of the entire law, including its object and policy, to ascertain the intent of Congress.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the exclusion of unprocessed film . . . would allow unrestricted interstate commerce in child pornography so long as the pornography was still in the form of undeveloped film”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Congress may amend a statute simply to clarify existing law, to correct a misinterpretation, or to overrule wrongly decided cases,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.