United States v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis
129 F.3d 1222 · 1997
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2010
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Narey v. Dean · United States v. Bierley · United States v. Gates · United States v. Costales · United States v. Edmondson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We consider the district court's determination of appellee's role in the offense a factual finding, and thus review it for clear error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.