United States v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis
129 F.3d 1372 · 1997
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Bruce Oliver v. James Woods (2000), United States v. Salzano (1998)
15 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Sokolow · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · United States v. Watson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“our task ... is not to pigeonhole each purported fact as either consistent with innocent travel or manifestly suspicious. Rather, the reasonable suspicion calculus turns on whether the specific articulable facts, viewed together through the lens of a reasonable law enforcement officer, justified a brief roadside detention.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When reviewing an order granting or denying a motion to suppress, we accept the trial court's findings of fact unless clearly erroneous and consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the district court's determination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Whether or not a party has voluntarily consented to a search is a question of fact that the district court must evaluate in view of the totality of the circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.