Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 F.3d 290 - Rhett v. Carnegie Center Associates

Rhett v. Carnegie Center Associates’s Empirical Analysis

129 F.3d 290 · 1997

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Urbano v. Continental Airlines, Inc. (1998), Gleklen v. Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Inc. (2000)

16 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

240199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston · Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he terms "because of sex" or "on the basis of sex" include, but are not limited to, because of or on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; and women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions shall be treated the same for all employment-related purposes. [42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e(k).]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the PDA `requires the employer to ignore an employee's pregnancy, but ... not her absence from work, unless the employer overlooks the comparable absences of non-pregnant employees,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the PDA does not require that employers treat pregnant employees better than other temporarily disabled employees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.