Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 F.3d 430 - United States v. Ewing

United States v. Ewing’s Empirical Analysis

129 F.3d 430 · 1997

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
March 2022
most recently cited

66 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably United States v. Galbraith (2000), United States v. Rivera-Santana (2012)

66 federal appellate ·

6401997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burns v. United States · Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners · Solventes Y Quimica de Nicaragua, S.A. Solquimisa v. Weaver · United States v. Taylor · United States v. Schmude

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the defendant clearly demonstrates acceptance of responsibility for his offense.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A defendant who enters a guilty plea is not entitled to an adjustment ... as a matter of right.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If (1) defendant willfully obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the administration of justice with respect to the investigation, prosecution, or. sentencing of the instant offense of conviction, and (2) the obstructive conduct related to (A) the defendant’s offense of conviction and any relevant conduct; or (B) a closely related offense, increase by 2 levels.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.