Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 F.3d 519 - Pippinger v. Rubin

Pippinger v. Rubin’s Empirical Analysis

129 F.3d 519 · 1997

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
February 2021
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2021 · most notably Doe v. Chao Secretary of Labor (2004), William Koch v. United States Trust Company of New York

27 federal appellate · 5 district ·

2501997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Applied Genetics International, Inc. v. First Affiliated Securities, Inc. · In re Disbarment of Sacco · United States Touhy v. Ragen · Alaska v. Babbitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'action so patently egregious and unlawful that anyone undertaking the conduct should have known it unlawful, or conduct committed without grounds for believing it to be lawful or action flagrantly disregarding others' rights under the Act.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the court of appeals cannot review a magistrate judge's order under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(A) unless the party requesting review objected to the order in writing to the district court within ten days of receiving a copy of the order.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the agency acted in a manner which was intentional or willful.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.