United States v. Strbac’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
August 2006
most recently cited
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on United States v. Booker · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Barnett · United States v. Stewart · United States v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant; (2) the need for the sentence imposed— (A) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense; (B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct; (C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and (D) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner; ;{{ * % j{s ifc * (4) the kinds of sentence and the sentencing range established for— (A) the applicable category of offense [as set forth in the sentencing guidelines] jfc ijc ‡ ‡ iH # (6) the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct; and (7) the need to provide restitution to any victims of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.