Erwin v. Crandall’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2016
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. American National Bank · Sparado v. Baird · Fannin v. Fritter · Baumeister v. Kuntz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That the owner and holder of a note may rely upon acceleration clause contained in the mortgage given to secure the payment of the note to accelerate the maturity of the note is well settled. Spadaro v. Baird, 97 Fla. 50 , 119 So. 788 . This is true although the note and mortgage are separate and distinct agreements and only may be acquired by indorsement and the other by assignment. See Taylor v. American National Bank of Pensacola, 63 Fla. 631 , 57 So. 678 , Ann.Cas.1914A, 309.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Street v. Sugerman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.