Broederdorf v. Bacheler’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Foman v. Davis · Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside · Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries Inc Ct
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a tort by which the defendant deprives the plaintiff of his right to a chattel or interferes with the plaintiff's use of possession of a chattel without ... consent and ... justification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“without ... consent and ... justification ,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.