State v. Mathews’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2015
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Katz v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · Oregon v. Elstad · United States v. Janis · Arizona v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“V. REMAINING ISSUES RAISED ON POST-TRIAL HEARING APPEAL AND APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION Having found the warrant deficient, we need not address the balance of the issues raised on appeal as they are rendered moot.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mathews“[t]he district court erred in summarily disposing of Mathews's post conviction application. We vacate and remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mathews“substantive right in a citizen to refuse to permit a search pursuant to an unsigned warrant”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bicknell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.