People v. Tonaldi’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on 91 Ill. 2d 536 - People v. Huckstead · Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities v. Civil Service Commission · United States v. Davis · 75 Ill. 2d 566 - Eastern v. Canty · United States ex rel. Tonaldi v. Elrod
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“court cites numerous Illinois cases). The Appellate Court noted that the one exception to the general rule that an issue which could have been raised on direct appeal is barred is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the situation where allegations of trial counsel's incompetence are based on facts which do not appear in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an issue not raised in the Appellate Court of Illinois and a claim involving facts outside of the trial court record,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.