Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 IND 290 - Burrell v. State

Burrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
December 1945
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1945

8 state decisions

30189119001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Welsh v. State · State ex rel. Cropper v. Murdock · Zonker v. Cowan · Bowlus v. Brier · Connors v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In our opinion, if the appellant was in a position to raise the question, it would not avail him. We think, however, he is precluded by the record from raising this point. . . . The record . . . shows . . . that the cause was continued ‘by consent of parties’ ... It will be presumed, therefore, that the accused voluntarily appeared in the Orange Circuit Court at that time and submitted himself to its jurisdiction, and consented to a continuance. At that time a transcript and the files were in fact on file in that court, and such appearance and agreement constitute a waiver of any mere technical informality in the transmission and certification of the papers.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Whenever he learned in any manner that he had forwarded an imperfect transcript ... to correct his mistake, and thus comply fully with the order made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.