Sheehan Construction Co. v. Leetch’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““1. The decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence. “2. The decision of the court is contrary to law. “3. The court erred in its conclusions of law. “4. The court erred in its conclusion of law #1. “5. Error of law occurring at the trial as follows: “(a) The court erred in overruling the objection of the plaintiffs to the admission of Defendants’ Exhibit E which objection was as follows: “ ‘Plaintiffs would object to Defendants’ Exhibit E for the reason that the matter becomes immaterial and of no significance in the case unless it was signed or an agreement acknowledged and accepted and offered and accepted by both parties.’ “which objection the court overruled and said exhibit was admitted in evidence. “ (b) The court erred in overruling the objection of the plaintiffs to defendants’ Exhibit B which objection was as follows: “ ‘The plaintiffs would object to Defendants’ Exhibit B for the reason that it does not show nor has it been shown that the check was accepted by the plaintiffs.’ “which objection the court overruled and the same was admitted in evidence.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 144 Ind. App. 656 - Smeekens v. Bertrand