Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 KAN 14 - Seeley v. Rose

Seeley v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
December 1941
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Noble v. Langmade · Weichold ex rel. Weichold v. Day

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The continued existence and identity of the court was not affected by a change of judges. The court does not resign or die and does not become defunct by the absence or change of its functionaries. The incoming judge had power to take up and dispose of unfinished business as fully as his predecessor could have done if there had been no change of judges.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.