Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 KAN 547 - Fry v. Heargrave

Fry v. Heargrave’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 1939
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City Township · Huls ex rel. Bork v. Lumber · Modern Woodman of America v. Hester · Potts v. West · Bowlus v. Winters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is axiomatic that the judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction cannot be attacked collaterally except for extrinsic fraud. If the fraud is intrinsic it must be corrected in the action which culminated in the judgment, by supplemental proceedings, or by appellate review. Otherwise there never would be an end to litigation, nor any public or private confidence in the binding force and finality of a court’s judgment. “The distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic fraud has often been expounded by this and other courts. [Citations.]” (p. 549.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.