Louque v. Dejan’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently December 1992 · most notably Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc. (1979), Goodkind v. Wolkowsky (1938)
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hunt v. Rousmanier's Administrators · Wylie v. Coxe · Willcox & Gibbs Sewing Machine Co. v. Ewing · French v. Cunningham · Willcox Gibbs Sewing-Mach Co v. Ewing
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Certainly, if the client had the right to dismiss the suit altogether, causing the destruction of the eventual res, he certainly had the lesser right to contract the res by employing another attorney, leaving to the first the right to recover for his services actually performed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““We will not review each decision cited by the defense. “As relates to the mandate: It is sufficient to state that tney sustain the proposition that an attorney’s mandate is governed by article 3028 of the Code, and not by article 2749.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`We find a ready answer by Chief Justice Marshall, in Hunt v. Rousmanier, 8 Wheat. (174), 178, 204, 5 L.Ed. 589 . It is that the power delegated to collect, and the interest of ownership in the property, are vested in the same person.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.