Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

129 La. 926

State v. Bagley

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 2, 1912

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1912-01-02

<p>Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; Thomas Fletcher Bell, Judge.</p> <p>B. B. Bagley was convicted of keeping a grog and tippling shop and of retailing intoxicants, and appeals.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1925

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1912-01-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BREAUX, C. J.

¶1The defendant was proceeded against on the charge of keeping a grog and tippling shop and of retailing intoxicants.

¶2From a sentence condemning him to pay a fine of $350, costs, and to serve 90 days on the public road, and, in default of payment, to serve an additional 90 days, he appealed.

¶3Defendant filed a motion for a bill of particulars.

¶4The district attorney complied with the bill of particulars.

¶5It does not appear that any objection was filed to the answer of the prosecuting officer as insufficient.

¶6There is no bill in the record.

¶7It is wel,l settled in jurisprudence, when no bill of exceptions is taken, no motion in arrest filed, nor an assignment of error, no error appearing on the face of the record, the verdict and the judgment will not be disturbed.

¶8That being the case here, it only remains for us to affirm the judgment.

¶9For reasons stated, the judgment is affirmed.

/129/la/926 · .json · Public domain