Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 MOAPP 63 - Chandler v. Reading

Chandler v. Reading’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1949
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1949

4 state decisions

2019081910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Colville v. Judy · Coberly v. Butler · Barr v. Flynn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has been repeatedly held that the statute must be strictly construed, and that it must appear that the road proposed is a way of necessity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.