Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 N.C. App. 192 - State v. Stinnett

129 N.C. App. 192 - State v. Stinnett’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2017

18 state decisions

120199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goss v. Lopez · Thompson v. Oklahoma · Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n · Stanford v. Kentucky · Miller v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny weak links in a chain of custody relate only to the weight to be given evidence and not to its admissibility.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “North Carolina courts have consistently held that when a punishment does not exceed the limits fixed by statute, the punishment cannot be classified as cruel and unusual in a constitutional sense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]dentification of evidence for the purpose of admission need not be unequivocal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.