Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 N.C. App. 823 - Reese v. Barbee

129 N.C. App. 823 - Reese v. Barbee’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2014

8 state decisions

60199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc. · State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmisten · Grimsley v. Nelson · Lackey v. Cooke · Grimsley v. Nelson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The UM carrier] is not precluded from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense where plaintiff has not timely commenced her action against it, even though the defense may not be available to the tort-feasor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.