Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 NH 171 - State v. Settle

State v. Settle’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
5
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Eagle Associates v. Bank of Montreal (1991), Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp. (1994)

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions

18019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1654

Relies on Eisner v. Macomber · 407 F. Supp. 451 - Turner v. American Bar Ass'n · Jones v. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority · Daniel M. Pilla and Jerome Daly v. The American Bar Association · State v. Settle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he Ninth Circuit construed the provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1654 , allowing personal appearance by a party, to permit a lay partner to appear on behalf of a partnership. Although the court reasoned that in representing the partnership he was representing his own interest, this begs the relevant question, which is whether the partner was representing any one else at the same time. Because he was necessarily representing the other partners as well, the Reeves court was mistaken in its implicit conclusion that the one partner’s appearance effected nothing more than personal representation. Reeves was analytical sport, without persuasive claim to be followed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.