Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 N.M. 119 - State v. Jason L.

State v. Jason L.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

251
cited by 251 later decisions
5
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

251 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 251 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably 209 Ill. 2d 492 - People v. Braggs (2004), State v. JAVIER M. (2001)

251 state decisions

1190200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall · Florida v. Bostick · Illinois v. Wardlow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 251 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The determination of a seizure has two discrete parts: (1) what were the circumstances surrounding the stop, including whether the officers used a show of authority; and (2) did the circumstances reach such a level of accosting and restraint that a reasonable person would have believed he or she was not free to leave? The first part is a factual inquiry, which we review for substantial evidence. The second part is a legal inquiry, which we review de novo.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Unsupported intuition and inarticulate hunches are not sufficient.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(1) the conduct of the police, (2) the person of the individual citizen, and (3) the physical surroundings of the encounter.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.