In Re Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
June 2012
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Romero v. Earl · Matter of Rawson · Matter of Rohr · Matter of Ruybalid · Matter of Hamar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Client] has requested that my office tender to your office a letter stating that payment of any bill for services she may incur will be made from settlement or ultimate judgment which [client] may receive as a result of the . .. automobile accident. It is understood that [client] will be ultimately responsible for the payment of any bill for services incurred with your office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Riegleman v. Krieg“[I]f [the lawyer] sent this letter intending that the vendor rely upon it to continue to render care and to postpone collection efforts, while intending not to be obligated to dispense settlement proceeds to the vendor, a more serious question of misrepresentation and fraud could arise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Riegleman v. Krieg“a common practice by which lawyers representing personal injury plaintiffs ensure clients will receive necessary medical treatment, even if unable to pay until the case is concluded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Yorgan v. Durkin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.