Scheidel v. Scheidel’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408 · 38 U.S.C. § 5301 · 38 U.S.C. § 5305
Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · Mansell v. Mansell · Walentowski v. Walentowski · Ryan v. Ryan · FIRST NAT. BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE v. Sanchez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he critical factor, for the purposes of complying with federal law, is that the court order does not specifically require that disability benefits provide the source of the funds paid to the non-military spouse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Danielson v. Evans“application for an increased disability rating was voluntary, and in furtherance of his own financial interests”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Danielson v. Evans“the only sources available to fulfill his financial obligations”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Danielson v. Evans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.