State v. Patscheck’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2023
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York · Maryland v. MacOn · United States v. Owens · United States v. Kimbrough · United States v. Medlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the particularity requirement must be applied with a practical margin of flexibility, depending on the type of property to be seized, and that a description of property will be acceptable if it is as specific as the circumstances and nature of activity under investigation permit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gonzales“The test for particularity is whether an executing officer reading the description in the warrant would reasonably know what items are to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.