State v. Todisco’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably Cordova v. World Finance Corp. of NM (2009), Heye v. American Golf Corp., Inc. (2003)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Tollett v. Henderson · Pollard v. United States · United States v. Loud Hawk · Commonwealth v. Pounds
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Traditionally, the right to a speedy trial protects against three types of prejudice: (1) oppressive pretrial incarceration, (2) anxiety and concern of the accused, and (3) the possibility of impairment to the defense. However, ... in a post-conviction situation, a delay in sentencing involves considerations different from those related to pre-trial delay. The alteration of [the] defendant’s status from accused and presumed innocent to guilty and awaiting sentence is a significant change which must be taken into account in the balancing process. Most of the interests designed to be protected by the speedy trial guarantee diminish or disappear altogether once there has been a conviction, and the rights of society proportionately increase. Therefore, the prejudice claimed by the defendant must be substantial and demonstrable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Calabaza“A sentencing hearing shall begin within ninety (90) days from the date the trial was concluded or the date a plea was entered[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lopez“[assumed] without deciding, that the [Sixth Amendment] speedy trial right [can be applied to delays in] sentencing proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lopez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.