State v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Tome v. United States · State v. Gomez · State v. Rojo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]t is the responsibility of counsel at trial to elicit a definitive ruling on an objection from the court. It is also trial counsel’s duty to state the objections so that the trial court may rule intelligently on them and so that an appellate court does not have to guess at what was and what was not an issue at trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wildgrube“While it may be proper for a defendant to have multiple theories of the crime, Defendant, in order to preserve an argument for appeal, must alert the trial court as to which theory is at issue in order to allow the trial court to rule on the objection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Balderama“`[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lacey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.