State v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably 1 N.M. Ct. App. 535 - State v. Tollardo (2012), State v. Barragan (2001)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Woodward · State v. Martin · Duncan v. Kerby · State v. Simonson · State v. Rowell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonable probability that the improperly admitted evidence could have induced the jury's verdict”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In order to warrant reversal, the erroneous admission of evidence must cause prejudice to a defendant. In determining whether a particular error committed by the trial court is harmless, we apply a three-part test: (1) the conviction must be supported by substantial evidence without reference to the improperly admitted evidence; (2) there must be such a disproportionate amount of permissible evidence against the defendant that the improperly admitted evidence appears minuscule in comparison; and (3) there was no substantial conflicting evidence to discredit the permissible evidence introduced by the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sena“We have previously distinguished between inadvertent remarks made by a witness about a defendant's inadmissible prior crime or wrong and similar testimony intentionally elicited by the prosecutor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.