Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 N.Y. 140 - Holmes v. . Evans

Holmes v. . Evans’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
10
states following
December 1998
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 6 district · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently December 1998 · most notably Ward v. New York Life Insurance (1919), Hinkle Iron Co. v. . Kohn (1920)

10 federal appellate · 6 district · 40 state decisions — followed in 10 states

12018911900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Christmas v. Russell · Fairbanks v. . Sargent

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An equitable assignment has been defined to be such an assignment as gives the assignee a title which, although not cognizable at law, equity will recognize and protect. Such an assignment passes an immediate equitable interest in the subject, although it is not essential to the creation of the interest that it should be immediately enforceable by suit for specific performance to recover the interest assigned. Whether, in a given case, the transaction amounts to an equitable assignment, depends to a great extent upon the intention. Where the transaction is evidenced by a written agreement, it depends upon the intention of the parties as manifested in the writing, construed in the light of such extrinsic circumstances as, under the general rules of law, are admissible in aid of the interpretation of written instruments.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.