State v. Cornell’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 2021
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Taylor · State v. Duncan · State v. Wallace · 34 Ohio App. 3d 180 - State v. Smith · 92 Ohio App. 3d 740 - State v. Justice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he admission of a declaration as an excited utterance is not precluded by questioning which: (1) is neither coercive nor leading, (2) facilitates the declarant's expression of what is already the natural focus of the declarant's thoughts, and (3) does not destroy the domination of the nervous excitement over the declarant's reflective faculties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“cases that invoke the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule involve assaults, automobile accidents, and similarly impactful events.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Columbus v. C.G.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.