Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 OHIOAPP3D 379 - Hines v. Riley

Hines v. Riley’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 138 Ohio App. 3d 244 - Schafer v. Rms Realty (2000), Blake Homes, Ltd. v. FirstEnergy Corp. (2007)

26 state decisions

1801998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 4 Ohio App. 3d 164 - Foust v. Valleybrook Realty Co. · State ex rel. Martin v. City of Columbus · Jones v. Consolidated Rail Corp. · Young v. Frank's Nursery & Crafts, Inc. · 39 Ohio App. 3d 99 - Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Hines testified that she ran at least one advertisement on an unknown *Page 12 date, and we must presume that she ran that advertisement a reasonable period of time before the start of spring quarter. Hines's testimony that she showed the apartment to several people who responded to the advertisement constitutes evidence that some prospective tenants were looking for housing at the time she advertised.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.