Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 OHIOAPP3D 838 - State v. Morgan

State v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Green v. United States · Arizona v. Washington · Oregon v. Kennedy · United States v. Scott · State v. Ishmail

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In cases where a mistrial has been declared without the defendant's request or consent, double jeopardy will not bar a retrial if (1) there was a manifest necessity or high degree of necessity for ordering a mistrial, or (2) the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where the trial judge sua sponte declares a mistrial, double jeopardy does not bar retrial unless the judge's action was instigated by prosecutorial misconduct designed to provoke a mistrial, or the declaration of a mistrial constituted an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, protects a criminal defendant from multiple prosecutions for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.